Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
« November 2005 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Hong Kong Independence Movement (HIM)
Friday, 11 November 2005
`Bull' leads charge of radio rebels
Activist is set to test officials' patience with another broadcast, write Justin Mitchell and Mimi Lau

Monday, November 07, 2005, The Standard

Eastern district councillor Tsang Kin- shing, who goes by the nickname "The Bull," seems to relish his self-appointed role as a Hong Kong radio rebel.

He's faced government inquiries since he organized a 90-minute October 3 "Citizen's Radio" broadcast on 102.8 FM, within the bandwidth used by the Metro Finance station owned by Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing.

The allegedly illegal transmission, which used content from People's Radio, a Hong Kong Internet station, reached Wan Chai, Causeway Bay and parts of Happy Valley.

A second broadcast is reportedly planned today, from 10pm-11.30pm, using a feed from People's Radio of a talkshow to be hosted by Raymond Wong, who was sacked by Commercial Radio, and legislator Emily Lau.

"I don't know our topic, yet," said Lau. "We just turn up and say whatever we want to say. I think we will talk about political reform."

Tsang, a burly, normally outspoken man, chose to keep mum October 24 when invited by the Office of the Telecommunications Authority to answer questions about the October 3 broadcast.

Just before he was questioned, he and legislator Leung Kwok-hung scuffled briefly with security guards outside the OFTA office when they called for an expansion of Hong Kong's airwaves.

"I chose the right to remain silent regarding the illegal radio broadcast accusation because the questioning was ambiguous," Tsang said.

On the same day, an OFTA official went to Tsang's house and asked his wife for information about Citizen's Radio. She refused to answer, and the visit lasted less than a minute. Tsang was furious and later blasted OFTA.

"[My wife] doesn't know anything about it and is not a public figure. They should come to me and leave my family alone," he said, adding that the government was acting like communists and creating a "red terror."

Wong was also summoned but refused to go to the OFTA office.

An OFTA spokeswoman said the government does not disclose details of an ongoing investigation. "Everything is being conducted using normal investigation procedures," she said.

It's not known how many listeners Tsang's broadcast reached.

"Maybe six or seven people, one taxi driver and others, called us during the broadcast," Tsang said. "It was also a test to see the government's ability to monitor us. We want all citizens to hear what we have to say. We have limited technology and equipment and if the government catches us they will take it. But I'm prepared to face criminal charges."

Tsang declined to give specifics about his transmitter but admitted it cost about HK$10,000. It was ordered via the Internet and can fit in a truck or van and be driven to different areas for future broadcasts.

Pointing to a chart of the FM frequencies assigned to all 13 city stations owned by three organizations, RTHK, Commercial Radio and Metro Radio, Tsang insisted 102.8 is not being used.

"When I listened to 102.8 before, I heard Guangzhou radio," he said.

But he couldn't explain that because FM channels are assigned a bandwidth of 200 kHz, and the midpoint of a channel's range - 102.5 in this case - is used for identification purposes, it means that he was likely squatting on Metro's signal.

"We don't intend to attack any particular station," he said when asked why a frequency on Metro's bandwidth was targeted. "There are 12 stations taking up a lot of space, more than they need."

Tsang said that in an earlier application for a license, he was told two AM spots were available. Why not go AM?

"No one listens to AM and not many Hong Kong radios or radios around the world have AM reception," he said, apparently not attuned to the fact that AM is the frequency of choice for talk radio - such as he is proposing - in the United States.

Eddie Leung, who organized the People's Radio Internet radio site last year, said, "I cannot speak for Tsang, but my opinion is that most people in Hong Kong listen to FM frequencies. Hong Kong people should have a wider choice of media, including more FM stations. The audience currently doesn't have too much choices."

Though Tsang denied singling out Metro Radio's frequency, Lam provided a clue. Lam and other backers had competed with Li for the FM slot. "I spent HK$3 million writing a proposal but, of course, we lost," Lam said. "However I really don't know why [Tsang used] that certain spectrum."

Tsang was a construction worker with a secondary school education who said he became politically galvanized in 1989 by the Tiananmen Square massacre, and went from pounding nails to politics as a full-time district councillor.

He was further inspired to organize Citizen's Radio - which he said has "less than 15 core members and more than 1,000 supporters" and depends on street donations - after the abrupt departure of Lam and Albert Cheng from Teacup.

In September Tsang applied for a license with the Television and Entertainment Licensing Authority for a 24-hour FM station featuring public affairs talkshows and live broadcasts of open meetings of district councils and government advisory bodies.

A TELA spokesman said his application is still being reviewed. Tsang said his chances for receiving permission was "harder than winning the Mark Six."

"I know his chances are quite slim," said Lam. "But he's an action man who really tries to get what what he wants, regardless of the end result. That's why people call him The Bull."

Posted by independenthongkong at 3:51 AM WST
Post Comment | Permalink
Sunday, 16 October 2005
For the Chinese government a referendum is a threat to the nation


Democratic Party protests demanding universal suffrage. According to Bishop Zen, the referendum is no threat to Hong Kong-Beijing relationship.

Hong Kong (AsiaNews/Agencies) – Gao Siren, director of the central government's liaison office, said that a referendum on universal suffrage was a “challenge to the country's political and constitutional system”.

Lawmakers from the Democratic Party are behind a push for greater democracy in the Territory; their goal is to get Beijing to agree to universal suffrage and the direct election to the post of Hong Kong Chief Executive. But the referendum they propose is not meant to be binding.

Yet, in an interview with Xinhua, Gao Siren stressed how the referendum was inconsistent with Hong Kong’s Basic Law no matter its form or packaging.

Hong Kong’s Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa also said that the proposed referendum was “inappropriate, inconsistent with established legal procedures, impractical and misleading to the public”. He warned that a referendum could seriously undermine the ‘cordial relationship’ with central authorities.

The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on April 26 had already dashed any hope for full democracy when it ruled our direct elections for the post of chief executive and universal suffrage for the Territory’s Legislative Council in 2007 and 2008.

A referendum “will not help promote [. . .] democracy in Hong Kong,” Mr Tung said, for it “departs from the Basic Law and the [Standing Committee's] decision in dealing with the electoral methods in 2007 and 2008."

The Chinese Catholic Church also weighed into the controversy in favour of the referendum. Some days ago, Mgr Joseph Zen, Bishop of Hong Kong, expressed his support for the measure to gauge public opinion on the issue of universal suffrage. According to the top prelate, finding out what people think “would not undermine the relationship between China and Hong Kong”.

Posted by independenthongkong at 3:47 PM JST
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 13 August 2005
Proposed Hong Kong National Anthem

Is it a great country?
Yes, it is.
Is it a great country?
Yes, it is.
Is it a great country?
Yes, it is.
Hong Kong is really great.
Is it our great country?
Yes, it is.
Is it our great country?
Yes, it is.
Is it our great country?
Yes, it is.
I love Hong Kong.
I love it forever and forever.
I love it forever for sure.
Is it our great country?
Yes, it is.
I love it forever and forever!
Why not we call ourselves a nation?
Yes, I think we should do so for sure.

NB: This proposed Hong Kong national anthem can be downloaded on http://www.geocities.com/hk_front/

Posted by independenthongkong at 5:23 AM JST
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 12 August 2005
A Song for Taiwanese People

Taiwan!
is an independent country
She is our homeland, how come she belongs to China?
The ROC Where? The biggest lie
Construction Taiwan, defend Taiwan, I 'm hugging Taiwan
Work hard!
Work hard!
Word hard!
Work hard to save Taiwan!
Taiwan is our nation!
Hurrah!
Taiwan is our nation!
Hurrah!
Hurrah!
Hurrah! Wow!

Posted by independenthongkong at 2:11 AM JST
Post Comment | Permalink
A Song for Chinese People

God Damn!
So unluck we are !
Scared of people's action become our deadly jail
CCP ~ fallen, and is disappearing,
We officers are escaping hurriedly
Fleeing!
Fleeing!
Fleeing!
We shall not be caught;
Grabbing people's money
Going!
Grabbing people's money
Going!
Going!
Going! Go!

Posted by independenthongkong at 2:10 AM JST
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 4 August 2005
Japan Is Wary of the Potential Threat from China

The contents of a new white paper by the official Japan defense Agency that devotes considerably more attention to the potential threat from China has major significance for Taiwan's own security.

Last Sunday, major Japanese media reported on the draft contents of the "defense of Japan 2005 White Paper," which will be officially presented to Prime Minister Koizumi Junichiro and his Cabinet in August.

The major feature of the annual white paper released this year by the Japan defense Agency is a considerable increase in discussion about the People's Republic of China and its emphasis on the close attention that Japan's Maritime Self-defense Force is paying to the actions of the PRC navy.

According to media reports, the white paper calls on Japan to heighten its alertness over the People's Republic of China's intensive efforts to promote military modernization and a rapid increase in military expenditures and adopt its own "active defense strategy" in response.

At the same time, the white paper noted that China's naval forces are adopting a strategy of outward projection to complement the exploration and development of offshore oil fields and also raises a warning to Tokyo to closely monitor the activities of PRC submarines.

Japanese concerned

The new defense report pointedly described how Tokyo reacted to last November's incursion into Japanese territorial waters in the East China Sea by a PRC nuclear submarine.

It points out that the Japanese people are concerned about Chinese activities in Japan's territorial seas and that therefore "it is important that China makes its military activities transparent."

The new white paper obviously lists China as a factor that poses a threat to the security of the East Asian waters.

It is also worth noting that the new Japanese defense white paper points out that China's growth in military expenditures has exceeded the torrid rate of increase in the PRC's gross domestic product and has displayed double-digit expansion for 17 consecutive years.

The new white paper clearly stated that "China is at present continuing to adopt a military strategy of active defense" and frequently mentioned the "theory of the Chinese threat."

Its use of language such as "alert" and "pay attention" transparently signaled Tokyo's wariness about China's military modernization drive.

Military expansion

The People's Republic of China's continuous rapid expansion of military spending and upgrading as well as Beijing's declared refusal to abandon the possible use of force against Taiwan indicates that the threat posed by China to Taiwan is considerably greater than faced by Japan.

Since the late 1940s under the then Kuomintang regime, to the present Democratic Progressive Party administration, Taiwan has always carried out its own separate assessments of threats and our reaction plans in the Taiwan Strait and has over the past half century invested considerable resources in national defense.

However, in light of current trends, even if Taiwan devotes all of its central government budget to defense, it will still be unable to catch up with China's present level of military spending. We therefore need to engage in serious and rigorous rethinking about how to develop an effective response.

Taiwan's traditional strategic concepts are already obsolete and unsuitable for use in the current situation in the Taiwan Strait, given the yawning gap in the military power of the two sides.

Tri-literal cooperation

Taiwan should cooperate with the United States and Japan to develop ways to redress the imbalance of military force in the Taiwan Strait in order to form a competent defense against the various and multi-layered threats from the PRC's misnamed "People's Liberation Army."

Such cooperative efforts can not only enhance the security guarantees for the Asia-Pacific region, but also constitute the best choice for Taiwan's own security.

Therefore, by adopting a capability-oriented comprehensive strategy, Taiwan can manifest its own self-defense capabilities and can also avoid overextending its own resources and capabilities.

In the past, the stability of the Taiwan Strait seemed to be a national security problem for Taiwan alone. It is becoming increasingly evident that Taiwan's security in fact also affects the security commitment of the United States toward the Asia-Pacific region as a whole.

Ever-rising threat

Regardless of whether China has a peaceful or non-peaceful rise, the PRC's rising military clout will pose an ever-rising threat to the positions of the United States and Japan in the western Pacific region.

Unless Washington or Tokyo is keen to see Taiwan become part of the PRC, they must establish a long-term and capability-oriented strategic planning and cooperation model together with Taiwan.

To allow Taiwan to face the pressure of the steadily expanding power of the PRC's military alone will absolutely lead to the disappearance of the "Taiwan Strait problem" and leave Beijing in the driver's seat for strategic domination in the western Pacific.

The findings of Japan's new defense white paper reinforce the conclusion that only the improvement of the imbalance in military power in the Taiwan Strait and the effective linkage and coordination of strategic and diplomatic policies among Washington, Tokyo and Taipei will be able to maintain lasting regional peace.

Posted by independenthongkong at 5:27 AM JST
Post Comment | Permalink
China Lies about Its Expansionism

China, whose military buildup alarms the Pentagon, marked Army Day on Monday with a pledge never to engage in expansionism but warned self-ruled Taiwan against formally declaring statehood.

The U.S. Department of Defense said in a report in July it was concerned about China's military modernization and economic might and feared that a changing balance of power in Asia could threaten democratic Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its own.

Making no reference to the report, General Cao Gangchuan, the defense minister, insisted that China was a peace-loving nation but warned Taiwan it would never be allowed to formally secede, said the People's Daily, the Communist Party mouthpiece.

"China will resolutely pursue an independent foreign policy of peace and a defensive national defense policy," Cao told a gathering at the Great Hall of the People on Sunday, the eve of the 78th founding anniversary of the People's Liberation Army.

"We will never engage in expansionism or seek hegemony and will resolutely walk the path of peace and development," said Cao, who is a vice-chairman of the decision-making Central Military Commission, which commands the PLA.

Beijing has claimed sovereignty over Taiwan since their split at the end of China's civil war in 1949. It has vowed to attack the island if it formally declares independence.

Cao toed the new line set by Communist Party and military chief Hu Jintao to show "the utmost sincerity and exert the greatest effort to seek peaceful unification" with Taiwan.

"(But) we will never allow 'Taiwan independence' splittist forces to cut off Taiwan from the motherland under any name or in any form," Cao said.

The PLA menaced Taiwan with war games and missile tests in 1995-96 ahead of the island's first presidential elections.

Political tensions continued to simmer until a mainland visit in April this year by the chairman of the Nationalist Kuomintang, the party which once ruled all of China but fled in 1949.

China, a nuclear power, has far more jet fighters, warships and submarines than Taiwan. But Western expert say Taiwan, armed to the teeth with U.S. and French jet fighters and frigates, could give China a bloody nose in any conventional conflict.

The United States has pledged to help Taiwan defend itself against any Chinese invasion.

LOYALTIES SPLIT

Hu, 62, took formal control of the military from Jiang Zemin, 78, last September, completing China's first smooth generational leadership change since the Communists took power.

But military sources say Hu, who had earlier replaced Jiang as Communist Party chief and state president, has yet to fully consolidate power in the 2.5-million-strong PLA.

Jiang promoted 79 men to full general rank during his 15 years in power, and clearly still wields some influence. Sources say PLA loyalties are split between Hu and Jiang.

In a sign of Jiang's residual influence, Cao paid tribute to Jiang's "Three Represents" political doctrine, which cracked open the party's doors to wealthy entrepreneurs.

Cao also pledged to carry out Jiang's precepts on national defense building, before stressing that the PLA would also seriously implement Hu's directives.

In Communist protocol, the names of leaders are mentioned in order of importance.

In a front-page editorial, the Liberation Army Daily urged the PLA on Monday to "obey and follow the party at all times and under any circumstances."

Hostile forces were out to "Westernise" and "divide" China and change the nature of the PLA by calling for depoliticisation, the editorial said without elaborating.

Posted by independenthongkong at 5:23 AM JST
Updated: Thursday, 4 August 2005 5:24 AM JST
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 16 July 2005
China ready to use nuclear weapons against US over Taiwan

BEIJING (AFP) - China could use nuclear weapons to retaliate against the United States if it attacked in any conflict over Taiwan, reports said citing a Chinese general.

"If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition on to the target zone on China's territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons," said General Zhu Chenghu.

His comments were reported by the Financial Times and the Asian Wall Street Journal, which attended a briefing with the general organised by a private Hong Kong organisation, the Better Hong Kong Foundation.

"If the Americans are determined to interfere (then) we will be determined to respond," said Zhu, a professor at China's National Defence University.

"We ... will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ... of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese."

Analysts said the remarks were largely rhetoric but also indicated that Beijing wanted to show the United States it was serious about Taiwan.

"China's leaders, especially the military, think it is important for weaker countries like China to demonstrate their willingness to defend their core interests," Joseph Cheng, a political analyst at City University in Hong Kong, told AFP.

"It's an old-fashioned strategy that is also meant for domestic consumption.

"On the Taiwan issue, the US government tends to adopt a strategic ambiguity approach. On the part of China, it wants to show it is ready to make the sacrifices," Cheng said.

China's military spending has risen at an average double-digit rate over the past decade, hitting 24.5 billion US dollars in 2004.

Despite this, it would still not have the capability to fight a conventional war against the United States, leaving the nuclear card as the only option, analysts said.

Although China has a no first-strike nuclear policy, Zhu said he believed the policy applied to non-nuclear powers and could be changed, the reports said.

Posted by independenthongkong at 2:30 AM JST
Post Comment | Permalink
Chinese Troops to Train Hong Kong High School Students

Hong Konger Press, July 16, 2005

A hundred form 3 and form 4 secondary school students are going to receive military training in the Hong Kong-based Chinese Garrison barracks from July 19 through July 30. The event will be the first of its kind. It is a shame Hong Kong youngsters will become trophies of the psychological and ideological wars the Chinese troops waging against Hong Kongers – the warfare which Beijing regime has been fighting against the former British colony since undemocratic 1997 Handover.

The 10-day so-called Hong Kong Youth Military Summer Camp was allegedly resulted from a joint operation of the pro-China Army-People-Having-Fun-Together Activities Preparatory Committee, the pro-China Advocates of Ethical Education, the Chinese Hong Kong Garrison, and the Education Planning Bureau of the HKSAR puppet regime.

During their ten-day military training, the mostly Hong Kong born and bred summer cadets will be taught to drill and run in the mornings, and in the afternoons they will have to attend ethics lessons wherein Chinese hegemonic thoughts and nationalism will probably be instilled into the poor Hong Kong kids.

Surprisingly, the Chinese Hong Kong Garrison will permit three famous Hongkong-trained physicians, namely Dr. Xie Defu, Dr. Wu Weiyong and Dr. Gao Yongwen to attend to the teenager cadets for the sake of“health care” – a move, coupled with the extremely short duration of the military summer camp, indicates that the Chinese troops try every means to make the Hongkonger-oriented military training camp look civilian and harmless.

Disguised, the so-called military training camp represents the first step Beijing regime takes to augment its political influence on Hong Kong students so that its decades-long political propaganda will no longer be limited to pro-China high schools in Hong Kong.

Posted by independenthongkong at 2:27 AM JST
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 9 July 2005
The CCP Is Willing to Attack Taiwan and Implement Fascism to Protect Its Political Power
Professor Yuan Hongbing, a well-known jurist, made a speech during a rally supporting Mr. Chen and Mr. Hao’s withdrawals from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in Sydney, Australia. He said that drawing Australia into its political camp is part of the CCP’s long-term global political strategy. The CCP is preparing to declare war on Taiwan in 2012, so that it can step into an overtly Fascist (1) state in order to solve the comprehensive crises it is facing today.
The Timetable of the Entire Fascist Strategy
Professor Yuan stated that the CCP’s entire Fascist strategy would proceed through the following stages:
1. Before the 2008 Olympic Games
During this period of time, the CCP primarily proposes to instigate and propel nationalism. At the same time, it will try hard to ensure a relatively stable social climate and maintain the present state so that it can push fanatical nationalism to a climax using the competitive environment of the Olympic Games.
2. For Two Years After the 2008 Olympic Games
The CCP will eliminate opposing voices inside its system. The CCP will solve its political crisis through severe political pressure. It will comprehensively oppress opposing groups, defined by the CCP as Falun Gong, political dissidents, and underground Christians.
3. Declare War Against Taiwan before 2012
The CCP intends to declare war against Taiwan before the 18th National People’s Congress in 2012. Once it declares war, it can move the country into a state of emergency. The CCP believes that only by declaring a state of emergency can its social, political, and financial crises be solved.
Professor Yuan said that because the CCP passed the Anti-secession Law in March, it incurred an intense response from the international community. The European Union stopped discussions about lifting the ban on sales of military equipment to China. Many observers did not understand why the CCP would commit such a foolish act. In fact, it is not a foolish act, but an intentional strategy.
Professor Yuan also revealed that the CCP plans to pass the Emergent State Act this year. It is also part of the comprehensive Fascist strategy as is the Anti-secession Law.
Regional Diplomatic Strategies
1. U.S. and Japan
In the eyes of the CCP, the U.S. and Japan are strategic allies that cannot be separated. Once China declares war against Taiwan, the two countries will become the real enemies of the CCP.
Although the U.S. and Russia have nuclear weapons, the CCP does not fear the U.S. the way it fears Russia, because it believes that Americans are afraid to use the weapons, as they cherish life. To China, the U.S. is not as big a threat as Russia.
2. The Northern and Southwestern Frontiers
Through many years of negotiations with the former Soviet Union, the CCP believes that if there were a nuclear war, the Russian’s strong nationalism means they would rather die than surrender. Therefore, the CCP is not willing to become Russia’s enemy. To placate the Russians, and guarantee that no military incidents will happen in the north of China, the CCP has freely given huge tracts of its Northern Frontier lands to Russia.
As for China’s southwest, the CCP wants to prevent India from invading through Tibet. The Tibetan Himalayas are actually a natural defensive barrier. Professor Yuan said, “The Dalai Lama intends to maintain a workable relationship with the CCP, because he hopes by doing so he can reverse the CCP’s policy of exterminating Tibetan religious beliefs. Actually, such a reversal will never happen because exterminating the Tibetan’s religion is part of the CCP’s larger strategy.”
3. Asia-Pacific Arena
The CCP wants to be allied with countries in the Asia-Pacific Arena. When war breaks out, these countries will, at least, be neutral and can form a buffer zone around China to deter the U.S. and Japan.
Viewing things from the present situation, some small countries in Southeast Asia, such as Burma, Laos, Singapore, etc. have basically become the CCP’s political colonies.
South Korea can be balanced by North Korea.
As for Indonesia, because it is a Muslim country, the CCP believes it cannot be subdued ideologically. Therefore, the best plan is to let Indonesia remain in a state of endless civil wars, able to focus only on itself.
As for Australia, a close ally of the U.S., the CCP’s strategy is to pacify it through education, economic alliances, culture, media, Chinese communities, etc. and gradually influence the Australian people’s ideology. Eventually, it will accept the CCP’s political and ideological ways.
Professor Yuan said, “Seen from the behavior of Australia’s people, this strategy has been effective. Public opinion in Australia already tends to support the CCP. When dealing with some problems relating to China, Australia has shown a tendency to betray its original guiding principles, such as freedom, democracy, and human rights.”
The CCP’s control of the Australian Chinese community and Chinese media is already a fact. Moreover, a teacher from Hong Kong working at a university in Australia lists anti-Falun Gong material as required reading and expects students to answer questions consistent with these materials in their exams. We really have to deeply ponder such a phenomenon.
The Real Purpose of Starting a War with Taiwan
Professor Yuan said, “Is the aim of starting a war with Taiwan really to protect China’s sovereignty and territory? Is it really for the benefit of China? No! This is entirely for the party’s own benefit. It attempts to solve its political, social, and financial crises through wars and emergent situations and in this way continue to maintain its despotic rule.”
“Once an emergent situation presents itself, the CCP can use the blood-and-iron method to suppress dissident groups to solve its political crisis, and suppress some hundred million unemployed workers to solve its social crises. Chinese people save their money, so it can also freeze people’s bank accounts, and can even legally transfer citizens’ private property to state-ownership or to the companies of corrupt officials. The CCP’s banking system is teetering on the edge of a black hole, which has unpaid debts as high as 40 percent to 60 percent of the total. This problem cannot be solved by any other means at present.”
Who Really Controls the CCP?
Professor Yuan stated that the people who really have the power are the “Taizi Party,”(children of former CCP leaders, who now hold important positions in the CCP, government offices, and the military) or the so-called Youth School. Its members are people like Jiang Mienheng, Bo Xilai, Liu Yazhou, etc. Politicians like Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao actually do not direct the CCP’s policies.
Professor Yuan reiterated that his assessment of the Chinese political system is accurate. This kind of understanding comes from many of his friends and classmates, such as the Provincial Party Committee Secretary of Liaoning Province, Li Keqiang, the former Provincial Party Committee Secretary of Henan Province, Meng Hongwei, Vice-minister of the Ministry of Public Security, and Wang Sanyun, Vice-minister of the Organization Department, and others. They are either his former classmates in the Law Department at Beijing University or old friends for many years. All of them are the central figures of the so-called fifth generation of the CCP.
*National Security Leading Team
The final decision-maker of important national strategy is the CCP’s “National Security Leading Team.” Jiang Zemin is still a member of the team.
*National Security Research Teams
Since 1990, CCP members have informally developed research groups to evaluate national security strategies. Most of the people in the Youth School or the Taizi Party mentioned above are members of these groups.
Before 2000, these groups often held informal meetings to discuss the CCP’s strategies. After 2000, they started to hold regular conferences. Any attendee is allowed to speak, but only one person records their comments. The speaker signs his approval after the speech is recorded. Then, it is submitted to the National Security Leading Team.
The discussions from these groups about national security strategies become the CCP’s real political direction.
The Origin of the Fascist Strategy
Professor Yuan said “The strategy to develop a Fascist state has actually been in place for a long time. It was first proposed by He Xin, who is my age or older.”
Professor Yuan then said, “The political leaders at that time, such as Zhao Ziyang and Hu Yaobang, despised He Xin’s proposal, but President Wang Zhen strongly supported the idea.”
It is said that the core of the CCP keeps He Xin, a member of Jiang Zemin’s intellectual group, in a low profile position to avoid exposing a complete political and economic conversion to Fascism.
The Persecution of Falun Gong in the CCP’s Fascist Strategy
A reporter asked, “Then, in this ambitious strategy, what is the importance of Falun Gong? If the CCP has such an ambitious global strategy, why does it go to such great lengths to suppress Falun Gong?”
Professor Yuan said, “In the big picture, Falun Gong is only one of the CCP’s political problems that need to be solved. When it announced its suppression of Falun Gong, it really thought that it would exterminate the practice within three months. However, things developed differently than expected, and now they have no choice but to continue to suppress Falun Gong.”
“To suppress people, including Falun Gong, the democratic movement, dissidents, and underground Christians using Fascist methods, is part of the CCP’s strategy.”
The Biggest Mistake the West Can Make is to Underestimate China
Professor Yuan suggests that the biggest mistake the West makes in evaluating China is that it always analyzes problems rationally, so it cannot precisely understand things happening in China. In fact, many important decisions made by the CCP are irrational. Though there are 9,999 reasons why one should not do something, and only one reason that one should do it, the CCP may make a decision based that one reason.
For instance, the day before the massacre of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Democratic Movement on June 4, Deng Xiaoping held a family meeting. During the meeting, Deng’s son’s, Deng Pofang and Deng Chihfang, said that if those people have their way our whole family will be pulled into the street and chopped into meat for sauce.
It is said that Deng made his final decision to massacre the people in Beijing because of that statement.
Spies Exceed 1,000
Mr. Chen Yonglin said, “There are more than one thousand spies in Australia.” Professor Yuan believes that the actual number is higher than that. He knows that people who go abroad with official passports must talk with the Security Department before leaving. “When they return to China, they have to report to the Security Department and provide written reports of their findings.”
Professor Yuan said that soon after he arrived in Australia, the Vice-minister of the Security Department personally flew to Australia and retained a well-known Western attorney to inquire about his activities in Australia. The CCP can find well-known Western attorneys to help find the information they want.
How Financial Black Holes are Formed
Professor Yuan gave an example, based on fact, of how gaping black holes in bank assets are formed.
A general manager in the most well-known real estate company in Beijing brought only 200 thousand yuan (US$24,155) to Beijing. He spent some money bribing the head of a county and signed a contract for 10,000 mu (1,640 acres) of undeveloped land at a cost of 50 yuan per mu.
After the general manger bought the land, he asked someone to prepare a development plan for the land, which no one had ever thought of developing. He did some minor work to start developing the land. Then, he bribed a property appraisal company to give him a land appraisal report. In the report, the land bought at 50 yuan per mu was valued at 10,000 yuan per mu. The general manger suddenly owned an asset worth one hundred million yuan.
But the one hundred million yuan was only on paper. How could it be turned into cash? He applied to a bank for a mortgage.
The general manger used the land now valued at one hundred million yuan, as collateral for a loan of fifty million yuan. He paid half of the money, 25 million yuan, to some related officials in the bank as a reward for their assistance and took the other half as profit. When the loan was due, the general manager gave the bank the deed to the undeveloped land because he was unable to pay the back the loan.
As a result, the 10,000 mu of undeveloped land was taken from the nation and returned to the nation. However, 50 million yuan was lost in the transaction. It became a bad account and the bank can never recover the money.
The CCP clearly understands that they cannot recover the money on these bad debts. So in their minds, risking Fascism has become the sole solution to their problems.
Doing One’s Best to Prevent Tragedies
Lastly, Professor Yuan indicated that he made public the CCP’s terrifying strategy of wholly espousing Fascism because he hopes to get the attention of all governments and people in the world. He wants to do his best to prevent the CCP from dragging China and the entire world into disaster for its own profit.

Posted by independenthongkong at 4:47 PM JST
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older